"What makes the Anthony Weiner story somewhat unique and thus worth discussing for a moment is that, as Hendrick Hertzberg points out, the pretense of substantive relevance (which, lame though it was in prior scandals, was at least maintained) has been more or less brazenly dispensed with here. This isn’t a case of illegal sex activity or gross hypocrisy (i.e., David Vitter, Larry Craig, Mark Foley (who built their careers on Family Values) or Eliot Spitzer (who viciously prosecuted trivial prostitution cases)). There’s no lying under oath (Clinton) or allegedly illegal payments (Ensign, Edwards). From what is known, none of the women claim harassment and Weiner didn’t even have actual sex with any of them. This is just pure mucking around in the private, consensual, unquestionably legal private sexual affairs of someone for partisan gain, voyeuristic fun and the soothing fulfillment of judgmental condemnation. And in that regard, it sets a new standard: the private sexual activities of public figures — down to the most intimate details — are now inherently newsworthy, without the need for any pretense of other relevance."
Glenn Greenwald, Salon (via iteeth)
(Source: salon.com, via conscientious)
-
pieceinthepuzzlehumanity liked this
-
joetomcollins reblogged this from clintirwin
-
laurenmitchell reblogged this from disgustinghuman and added:
While I do wholeheartedly agree with this, I think part of the reason people are upset is because he basically flat-out...
-
zhounder liked this
-
paintz liked this
-
thisnewscandal reblogged this from hotndheavy
-
earleydaysyet reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
-
hotndheavy reblogged this from classybroad
-
cobra-snake liked this
-
three-1 liked this
-
heatherfeathered liked this
-
progressivehumanity reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
-
faykejayke reblogged this from pseudolibrarian
-
pseudolibrarian reblogged this from crowdmyheart
-
mytinderbox liked this
-
bigmoeyo liked this
-
teaandtheatre reblogged this from pantslessprogressive and added:
“Keep your face out of Weiner’s Weiner…unless he tweets you a picture of it, of course.”
-
sweetidiot reblogged this from classybroad
-
riograndegorgeous reblogged this from classybroad
-
kenikila liked this
-
greatleapsideways liked this
-
classybroad reblogged this from dendroica and added:
That’s my Congressman, dudes.
-
blueskyguy liked this
-
curdiogenes reblogged this from conscientious
-
joetomcollins liked this
-
windycitylady reblogged this from absurdlakefront
-
legitimatehypnotist reblogged this from hitshift5timesforstickykeys
-
theinvisiblecommission reblogged this from anticapitalist
-
theinvisiblecommission liked this
-
hitshift5timesforstickykeys reblogged this from anticapitalist
-
pheletone-deactivated20110211 reblogged this from anticapitalist
-
anticapitalist liked this
-
resurrecthobbes liked this
-
rawrlawra reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
-
threexstan reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
-
hippygrungehipster reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
-
cactustreemotel reblogged this from vruz
-
binxbolling liked this
-
catlitternwhiskersonkittens liked this
-
viviano reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
-
isthereanybodyaliveoutthere reblogged this from moderateblogger
-
lizachannah reblogged this from pantslessprogressive and added:
…while I don’t totally agree with this — I think one of the main issues here was Weiner lying to his constituents, as...
-
sarahstocracy reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
-
snazzyjourneys reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
-
dazaibrosamu liked this
-
clintirwin reblogged this from markellison
-
markellison reblogged this from whyinthehell
-
via-incognita reblogged this from vruz
-
generalbriefing liked this
-
powersigh liked this
- Show more notes